Fundamental Analysis: The P/E Ratio

Introduction: Navigating the Market with Awareness

In the vast and dynamic world of stock investments, fundamental analysis is your guiding compass. It allows you to look beyond simple price fluctuations and understand a company’s true value. For this reason, learning to understand the P/E ratio is the fundamental indicator for evaluating stocks and investing with awareness. This ratio, also known as the P/E Ratio (Price/Earnings ratio), stands out for its popularity and, often, for its ability to generate both valuable insights and misunderstandings.

This indicator is ubiquitous in financial discussions, yet its interpretation isn’t always as straightforward as it seems. Does a high P/E Ratio mean a stock is “expensive”? Does a low P/E automatically make it a good deal? The answer, as is often the case in finance, is: “it depends.”

In this article, we’ll clarify the P/E ratio. We’ll explain what it is, how to calculate it, and, most importantly, how to interpret it correctly to avoid pitfalls and make more informed investment decisions. Get ready to discover the true power of this key indicator.

What is the P/E (Price/Earnings) Ratio?

The P/E Ratio (Price/Earnings ratio) is one of the most widely used indicators in fundamental analysis to assess the attractiveness or “price” of a stock relative to the earnings the company generates. In simple terms, it tells you how many “years of earnings” it would take to recoup the current stock price, assuming earnings remain constant. Therefore, it’s a valuation metric that compares a stock’s current market price with the earnings per share (EPS) that the company has generated.

The P/E Formula

Calculating the P/E is surprisingly simple:

P/E=Earnings Per Share (EPS)Price per Share​

• Price per Share: This is the current price at which a company’s stock is traded on the market. Notably, this value fluctuates continuously during trading hours.
• Earnings Per Share (EPS): This is the company’s net profit divided by the total number of outstanding shares. EPS is a key figure found in a company’s Income Statement and represents the portion of profit attributable to each single share. For instance, if a company generated a net profit of €10 million and has 10 million shares outstanding, its EPS would be €1.

Practical Examples to Understand P/E and Calculate EPS

Let’s look at a couple of examples to illustrate how the P/E works, including the EPS calculation.

Example 1: “Alfa Tech” Company

Imagine Alfa Tech has the following data:

• Annual Net Income: € 50,000,000
• Number of Shares Outstanding: 10,000,000 shares
• Current Price per Share: € 50

Step 1: Calculate Earnings Per Share (EPS)

EPS (Alfa Tech)=Number of SharesNet Income​=10,000.000€50,000,000​=€5 per share

Step 2: Calculate the P/E

P/E (Alfa Tech)=EPSPrice per Share​=€5€50​=10

What does it mean? A P/E of 10 indicates that investors are willing to pay 10 times the annual earnings for a share of Alfa Tech. In other words, it would take 10 years of earnings to “recover” the price paid for the stock, assuming earnings remained constant.

Example 2: “Beta Innova” Company

Consider, Beta Innova with this data:

• Annual Net Income: € 20,000,000
• Number of Shares Outstanding: 5,000,000 shares
• Current Price per Share: € 100

Step 1: Calculate Earnings Per Share (EPS)

EPS (Beta Innova)=Number of SharesNet Income​=5,000,000€20,000,000​=€4 per share

Step 2: Calculate the P/E

P/E (Beta Innova)=EPSPrice per Share​=€4€100​=25

What does it mean? A P/E of 25 for Beta Innova suggests that investors are willing to pay 25 times the annual earnings. This, at first glance, might suggest that Beta Innova is more “expensive” than Alfa Tech.

However, it’s crucial not to stop at the number alone. As we’ll see in the next section, the P/E by itself doesn’t tell the whole story. Its true utility emerges when it is interpreted in the right context.

How to Interpret the P/E: Beyond the Simple Number

We’ve seen how to calculate the P/E, but its value is never absolute. A P/E of 10 for a company isn’t inherently “good” or “bad.” The true power of this indicator emerges when you interpret it in the right context. Therefore, to gain meaningful insights, you must consider several key factors.

1. Industry Sector and Average Values:

The first and most important comparison to make is with the average P/E of companies operating in the same industry. Some sectors, in fact, tend to have higher average P/E ratios than others.

• Growth sectors (e.g., technology, biotechnology): Often exhibit high P/E ratios. This occurs because investors are willing to pay a higher price today, anticipating much faster future earnings growth. Companies like tech firms, which reinvest a large portion of their profits to expand rapidly, often fall into this category.
• Mature and stable sectors (e.g., utilities, consumer staples): Typically have lower P/E ratios. These companies tend to grow more slowly, offer more predictable earnings, and often distribute higher dividends.

It’s essential to compare a stock’s P/E not only with its industry peers but also with the company’s own historical average P/E. A current P/E significantly higher than its historical average might suggest that the stock is overvalued, or that growth expectations have dramatically increased. Conversely, a P/E below its historical average could indicate that the stock is undervalued, or that there are underlying problems justifying its lower price.

2. Earnings Growth (Growth Rate):

A high P/E might not be a sign of “excessive cost” if the company is growing rapidly. On the contrary, a high P/E in a company with strong earnings growth prospects is often justified. Investors, in fact, are betting on the company’s ability to increase its profits over time, thereby reducing the future P/E ratio relative to the current price. Conversely, a low P/E in a company with stagnant or declining earnings might indicate underlying problems rather than a bargain.

Practical Example: Alfa Tech vs. Beta Innova and Future Growth

Let’s revisit our two companies from previous examples:

• Alfa Tech: P/E = 10 (with EPS of €5)
• Beta Innova: P/E = 25 (with EPS of €4)

At first glance, Alfa Tech (P/E 10) seems much more “affordable” than Beta Innova (P/E 25). However, let’s consider their expected annual earnings growth for the next 5 years:

• Alfa Tech: Expected earnings growth of 2% per year.
• Beta Innova: Expected earnings growth of 20% per year.

What changes with growth?

If Beta Innova were to indeed maintain 20% annual growth, its earnings per share (and consequently, its value) would increase much faster than Alfa Tech’s. This means that the P/E of 25, which seemed high today, could become much more “reasonable” or even low in the future, as EPS grows.

As a result, investors are willing to pay a premium (a higher P/E) for companies like Beta Innova precisely because of their strong future growth prospects. Buying a stock with a high P/E in a rapidly expanding company can prove to be an excellent investment if the expected growth materializes.

3. General Market Conditions:

The P/E of individual companies is also affected by the general market sentiment. During periods of economic euphoria (bull market), P/E ratios tend to rise for almost all stocks, as investors are more optimistic and willing to pay more for future earnings. Conversely, during periods of uncertainty or recession (bear market), P/E ratios tend to fall.

4. Earnings Stability and Quality:

Not all earnings are created equal. A company with stable and predictable earnings (perhaps due to a robust business model or a lasting competitive advantage) can justify a higher P/E Ratio than a company with volatile earnings or a single source of income. In other words, the quality of earnings is as important as their quantity.

5. Company Indebtedness:

A company with a high level of debt may have a lower P/E Ratio because the financial risk is greater. Debt, in fact, increases a company’s vulnerability to interest rates and can erode earnings available to shareholders. For a complete valuation, it’s fundamental to integrate the P/E with metrics that analyze debt, such as the Debt/EBITDA ratio.

In summary, the P/E is not a magic formula for determining whether a stock is “expensive” or “cheap.” It is a powerful tool that, however, requires in-depth contextual analysis. It should be used in combination with other indicators and with a clear understanding of the company’s business and its industry.

P/E Trailing vs. P/E Forward: Looking to the Past or the Future?

When discussing the P/E, it’s crucial to understand that there are primarily two versions of this ratio: the P/E Trailing (or Historical) and the P/E Forward (or Prospective). The key distinction lies in the earnings used in the calculation, and this difference is fundamental for your analysis.

P/E Trailing (Historical): Based on the Past

The P/E Trailing is the most common and easy-to-calculate version of the P/E. It uses the earnings per share (EPS) that the company has actually generated over the past 12 months.

P/E Trailing=Earnings Per Share (EPS) from the Last 12 MonthsPrice per Share​

• Advantages: It’s based on real, verifiable data, thus it’s a concrete figure that isn’t affected by estimates or forecasts.
• Disadvantages: It primarily looks to the past. A rapidly growing or sharply declining company, for example, might have a Trailing P/E that doesn’t accurately reflect its future prospects. Additionally, if earnings were exceptionally high or low in the last year due to non-recurring events, the Trailing P/E could be misleading.

P/E Forward (Prospective): Based on Future Estimates

The P/E Forward, on the other hand, uses estimates of future earnings per share (EPS) for the next 12 months (or sometimes for the next fiscal year). These estimates are usually provided by financial analysts who cover the company.

P/E Forward=Estimated Earnings Per Share (EPS) for the Next 12 MonthsPrice per Share​

• Advantages: It attempts to anticipate the future, providing a more relevant view for investors who focus on growth prospects. Moreover, it’s often more useful for evaluating companies in dynamic or rapidly evolving sectors.
• Disadvantages: It’s based on forecasts, which by definition can be imprecise. Analyst estimates, furthermore, can vary and are subject to revisions, especially if economic conditions or company prospects change.

Which P/E to Use?

Generally, both the P/E Trailing and P/E Forward have their utility and should be considered together.

• The P/E Trailing gives you a solid benchmark based on past performance.
• Conversely, the P/E Forward offers you a perspective on expected growth and how the market is pricing that growth.

If a company has a P/E Trailing that appears very high but a Forward P/E that is significantly lower, this could indicate that analysts expect strong earnings growth in the future, thereby justifying the current price. On the contrary, if the Trailing P/E is low but the Forward P/E is similar or even higher, it might signal that expected growth is stagnant or declining, which warrants further investigation.

Limitations of the P/E: When the Number Isn’t Enough

Despite its popularity and usefulness, the P/E is not a perfect metric and presents several limitations that every investor should be aware of. Relying solely on the P/E, in fact, can lead to incorrect conclusions and ill-informed investment decisions.

Here are the main cases and scenarios where the P/E can be misleading:

1. Companies with Losses (Negative or Zero P/E): When a company records a loss (negative net income), its EPS becomes negative. Consequently, the P/E calculation will result in a negative or zero value. In such situations, the P/E loses any meaning as a valuation tool. You simply cannot “pay” a multiple of non-existent or negative earnings. Therefore, to value companies with losses (which are typical, for example, in the early growth stages of startups or biotechnologies), you’ll need to rely on other metrics such as the Price/Sales (P/S) ratio or cash flow.
2. Volatile or Non-Recurring Earnings: The P/E is based on earnings, which can be very volatile from one quarter to the next or from one year to the next. For instance, a company might have exceptionally high earnings in a given period due to the sale of a non-strategic asset or an extraordinary tax refund. This “one-time” earning would artificially inflate the EPS, making the P/E appear lower than it actually is, thereby suggesting a “cheap” stock that isn’t truly so. Conversely, exceptionally low earnings due to restructuring costs or temporary write-downs could inflate the P/E, making the stock appear “expensive.”
3. Accounting Differences: Different companies, even within the same industry, may use slightly different accounting methods (for example, in depreciation or inventory management) which affect the determination of net income. These differences can, therefore, make a direct comparison of the P/E between two companies less reliable. For this reason, it’s important to analyze the notes to the financial statements and, if possible, normalize certain data.
4. Highly Indebted Companies: The P/E does not take into account a company’s level of indebtedness. Two companies might have the same P/E, but the one with significantly higher debt carries greater risk for investors. A heavily indebted company, in fact, could face difficulties meeting interest payments on its debt, ultimately eroding earnings and jeopardizing its stability. For a complete valuation, it’s fundamental to integrate the P/E with metrics that analyze debt, such as the Debt/EBITDA ratio.
5. Ignores Cash Flow: Accounting earnings, on which the P/E is based, do not always correspond to the actual cash generated by a company. The Income Statement can include revenues not yet collected or expenses not yet paid. The Cash Flow Statement, on the other hand, shows you the true cash availability. A company with a good P/E but poor operating cash flow could, consequently, face liquidity problems. Therefore, it’s essential to analyze the P/E in conjunction with the Cash Flow Statement.

In conclusion, the P/E is an excellent starting point for your analysis, but it should never be the only end point. Always use it in combination with other fundamental indicators and with a clear understanding of the company’s business, industry, and future prospects.

Conclusion: The P/E, a Powerful but Not Solitary Indicator

We’ve explored the Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio in all its facets. We’ve understood that, although it is one of the most immediate and widespread indicators for evaluating a stock’s “attractiveness”, its true strength lies in the ability to be interpreted correctly.

To recap, we’ve seen that:

• The P/E tells you how much investors are willing to pay for every euro of profit generated by a company.
• It’s crucial to distinguish between Trailing P/E (historical) and Forward P/E (prospective), as the former looks to the past and the latter to future growth expectations.
• Interpreting the P/E must always occur within the context of the industry, earnings growth rate, market conditions, and the quality of the earnings themselves.
• Above all, the P/E has significant limitations: it’s not useful for companies with losses, can be distorted by volatile or unusual earnings, and doesn’t account for debt or actual liquidity.

Ultimately, the P/E is an indispensable tool in your fundamental analysis toolkit. It’s an excellent starting point for screening opportunities and asking your initial questions about a company’s valuation. However, it is never the complete answer. Every number in a financial statement and every financial indicator is a piece of a larger puzzle. The true mastery of an investor lies in being able to assemble all these pieces.

What Happens Next?

With this in-depth understanding of the P/E, you are now able to look at this number with a more critical and informed eye. However, fundamental analysis is a continuous journey. In the upcoming articles of this series, we will continue to explore other key indicators, such as EBITDA, ROE (Return on Equity), the Debt/EBITDA ratio, and many more. We’ll discover how each of them adds a valuable piece to your valuation puzzle, allowing you to build a comprehensive and robust view of the companies in which you choose to invest.

Don’t miss the next posts!